人兽性交

Tomorrow, the House Subcommittee on Immigration Policy and Enforcement will hold a at the Rayburn House Building entitled, 鈥淢aking Immigration Work for American Minorities.鈥� On the witness list are two figures whose views of immigrants are less than charitable: Carol Swain, an African-American professor of political science and law at Vanderbilt University, and Frank Morris, former head of the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation and a board member of the anti-immigrant hate group, (FAIR).

Swain has some very odd views for someone selected to lecture Congress on immigration and minorities. In her 2002 book, , Swain argued, in essence, that America doesn鈥檛 need to reject 鈥� people who want the U.S. to be run by and for whites. Rather, it needs to start talking to them, and taking their ideas seriously, particularly when it comes to immigration and racial preferences. In the book, Swain says that white people have been muzzled by political correctness, while African Americans are allowed 鈥渢o verbally assault and slander whites with racial epithets and false charges without suffering any serious loss of respect or any financial or social damage in the public arena.鈥�

In 2009, Swain a slick 58-minute documentary, 鈥淎 Conversation About Race,鈥� devoted to proving the thesis that racism is a bogus concept invented to oppress whites. In a blurb that was posted on the documentary鈥檚 website, Swain called the film 鈥渙utstanding鈥� and 鈥渕eticulously done.鈥� 鈥淸I]t offers people of all races a rare opportunity to engage in cross-racial dialogue,鈥� she wrote. 鈥淚 highly recommend this film for social science courses dealing with race, class, and ethnicity.鈥� When it turned out that Swain鈥檚 much-lauded filmmaker on YouTube and a number of other websites, repeatedly describing blacks as 鈥渕onkeys鈥� and black men in particular as 鈥淓VIL monkeys [who] are DESTROYING鈥� America, and even suggesting that a black former White House adviser be lynched, 鈥淸p]ossibly with the aid of a noose,鈥� Swain continued to heartily recommend the film, with its 鈥減oignant鈥� scenes, to 鈥渕ulticultural forums across the country.鈥�

Lately, Swain鈥檚 big bugaboo has been immigration. In 2007, Swain published Debating Immigration, which included an essay by prominent white nationalist , who runs that anti-immigrant hate site, , named for the first English baby born in America. Swain later served as a paid commentator on 鈥淟ou Dobbs Tonight鈥� before he was pushed off the air by CNN for repeatedly demonizing immigrants.

It comes as no surprise that Swain鈥檚 written testimony is harsh on immigrants. She accuses 鈥渕illions of foreign-born persons鈥� of having 鈥渙penly stolen jobs, goods, and opportunities from law-abiding American citizens.鈥� Dismissing the idea that some of the undocumented might be 鈥済ood people,鈥� Swain says, 鈥淲hat matters is their choice to enter the country unlawfully and thumb their noses at the laws and regulations that Congress has enacted to protect the people.鈥� Undocumented immigrants, according to Swain, 鈥渄amage our national sovereignty and standing in the world.鈥�

Frank Morris, perhaps the most prominent African-American anti-immigrant activist of the last decade, will also be testifying at the hearing. Morris has held many positions in groups set up by , the racist architect of the modern anti-immigrant movement. For Tanton, American culture requires 鈥渁 European-American majority, and a clear one at that,鈥� something that Tanton believes today鈥檚 Latin American immigrants are making impossible. Morris is currently on the board of directors of FAIR, where he serves alongside Tanton, who founded the group in 1979. Morris is also a board member at the Center for Immigration Studies, which was conjured up by Tanton in the 1980s and started out life as a project of FAIR.

In his written testimony, Morris is completely dismissive of those who have concerns about the increasing level of vitriol and racism 鈥� like that exhibited in Tanton鈥檚 comments about a majority-white America 鈥� in the debate over America鈥檚 immigration policies. 鈥淚t is relevant to note here that charges of racism during immigration debates are always leveled toward those in favor of reduced immigration regardless of their reasons,鈥� Morris writes. Morris is particularly incensed and calls an 鈥渆rror鈥� that 鈥減rivileged immigrants, including illegal alien immigrants,鈥� whatever that means, are allowed to compare their struggles to the 鈥淏lack civil rights movement.鈥�

More recently, Morris signed on as a board member with Progressives for Immigration Reform (PFIR), a group devoted to blaming immigrants for environmental problems. In the last few years, key nativist groups have increasingly been taking up this strategy, which is often labeled 鈥�.鈥� They have spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to run full-page advertisements appealing to liberals in an array of publications. They鈥檝e built a series of websites aimed at 鈥減rogressive鈥� environmentalists 鈥� and many of those sites are run by people who are also principals of right-wing nativist groups.

PFIR, a central actor in this greenwashing campaign, was launched in 2009 with the help of key candidates, including Morris, in its 2004 elections. Morris and his compatriots targeted the club in an attempt to turn the organization away from its historic mission of protecting the environment and reorient it towards agitating against immigration. The candidates were all soundly defeated.