Swimming Upstream: Counter-Currents Accuses American Renaissance Of Futility
In the final moments of a year marked by disorganization, personal attacks, and dramatics on the white nationalist right, leaders of the movement haven鈥檛 failed to disappoint with one last public dispute.
Greg Johnson, editor of Counter-Currents, a white nationalist publishing house, penned an article just days before the New Year, titled 鈥淩ethinking the White Nationalist Conference.鈥� In that essay, Johnson claims that national conferences have become exercises in self-congratulation and resource squandering for many on the racist right.
The primary example of this futility, according to Johnson, is聽Jared Taylor鈥檚 long running American Renaissance conference.
鈥淭he days when American White Nationalists could court global media attention by holding public conferences at private facilities are over,鈥� wrote Johnson, lamenting the loss of coverage by 鈥渕ajor media鈥� like CSPAN and National Public Radio.
And Johnson has a point. White nationalist conferences have become obsolete. As more news sources appear in the Internet age, the message that was once so incendiary that it would attract the attention of major television and newspaper outlets has been drowned out by Internet static. What Johnson recommends in response is an effort to refocus resources on local events to build the base, instead of massive national conferences.
Predictably, other white nationalist organizers, including some writing for Johnson鈥檚 own site, disagree.
Matthew Parrott, co-founder of the Traditionalist Youth Network, immediately 聽with Johnson鈥檚 claims that national conferences are an inefficient use of what funds are available to white nationalists.
鈥淕reg鈥檚 correct that the political backdrop has changed dramatically in the decades since the first conference,鈥� Parrott wrote. 鈥淏ut the mainstream media is much smaller and much less respected than it was then. The past twenty years have been far more kind to AmRen than it鈥檚 been to the media weasels set against it.鈥�
Ironically, Counter-Currents, the home of both Johnson and Parrott鈥檚 articles, is one of the most successful fundraising operations in all of white nationalism. The publisher鈥檚 2013 and 2014 fundraisers have each topped $40,000. Until recently, the organization also made effective use of the Amazon affiliates program to receive a 7% commission on all purchases made through a link to the Amazon marketplace on the Counter-Currents website. Amazon recently suspended their account for violating the terms of use agreement.
The site鈥檚 ability to raise money has allowed Johnson to operate as one of the only full-time white nationalist activists. However, the privileged position from which he peddles his brand of pseudo-intellectual extremism has not stifled his complaints that the sums raised at the American Renaissance conference would be more than enough to hire a several full-time staffers to promote white nationalism.
Johnson doesn鈥檛 trumpet his successful fundraising while making these points. Neither do Parrott and Brad Griffin of the white nationalist blog Occidental Dissent, who also published a rebuttal. Instead, he takes issue with Johnson鈥檚 focus on intellectualizing and abstracting white nationalism.v
鈥淭he inevitable result of retreating from the real world into cyberspace will be to rely even more on anonymity,鈥� Griffin wrote. 鈥淸It] will strengthen the taboos, generate more fear, cowardice, and conspiratorial paranoia in our ranks, exacerbate points of disagreement, and further impoverish the already low state of social capital in the movement.鈥�
