Voters and Voting Rights Organizations Praise Injunctions of Multiple SEB Rules
ATLANTA听鈥斕齌his week, Fulton County Superior Court Judge Thomas A. Cox issued an听听permanently enjoining several recently-adopted Georgia State Election Board (SEB) rules, including two rules related to certification of elections and a rule mandating the hand-counting of ballots. Fulton County Superior Court Judge Robert McBurney also issued a听ruling听last night blocking the SEB鈥檚 hand-counting of ballots rule across the state prior to county certification of election results. These decisions follow another order from Judge McBurney requiring county boards of election and their members to certify election results in accordance with Georgia law. The Southern Poverty Law Center (人兽性交), the Legal Defense Fund (LDF), Advancement Project and Campaign Legal Center filed amicus briefs in four lawsuits all on behalf of individual voters, the League of Women Voters of Georgia (LWVGA), Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc., the New Georgia Project and the Secure Families Initiative to urge the court to enjoin three of the SEB鈥檚 recently adopted rules:
- ;
- ;
- ;
- 补苍诲听.
鈥淲e are elated about these judicial decisions. The SEB's recently adopted rules could have jeopardized the rights of Georgia voters and unnecessarily delayed the outcomes of this crucial election,鈥澨said听Poy Winichakul, senior staff attorney with the 人兽性交. 鈥淭hese rulings represent a victory for all Georgians who uphold the principles of free and fair elections within a democratic framework.鈥
鈥淲e applaud the judicial decisions blocking the Georgia State Election Board鈥檚 unlawful rules, which are inconsistent with Georgia law and would risk disrupting the election administration process,鈥澨said John S. Cusick, assistant counsel at the Legal Defense Fund. 鈥淚f kept in place, the Hand-Count and Certification Rules could potentially strip Georgians of their fundamental right to vote, likely impacting Black voters and other historically disenfranchised voters disproportionately. But the fight is not over, and we will continue protecting Georgians鈥 right to vote and have their votes counted.鈥
鈥淭he decisions blocking the hand count and certifications rules are significant victories in the fight to protect voting rights in Georgia,鈥澨said Elsie Cooke-Holmes, international president of Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc.听鈥淭hese rules were unnecessary and harmful barriers designed to undermine confidence in our democratic process. Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc. remains steadfast in our efforts to challenge unlawful measures that threaten election integrity. We are committed to ensuring that our members and the communities we serve can fully participate in shaping our nation鈥檚 future.鈥
鈥淪triking down the State Election Board鈥檚 hand-count and other rules is a major win for voters, election integrity, and democracy as a whole,鈥澨said Nichola Hines, president of the League of Women Voters of Georgia. 鈥淭hese rules were introduced with bad intentions and aimed at causing chaos in Georgia鈥檚 secure elections process. The League remains committed to standing up for Georgia voters every step of the way.鈥
鈥淭hese judicial decisions are critical to ensuring that every Georgia voter's voice is heard in the upcoming election,鈥澨said John Powers, director of the Power & Democracy Program at Advancement Project. 鈥淭hese Georgia State Election Board rules were clearly intended to undermine Georgia's election certification process. The Board should be focusing instead on supporting election administrators, increasing trust in our election results, and expanding access to the ballot box.鈥
鈥淭oday we celebrate a victory for the voting rights of all Georgians, and particularly those serving their country far away from home,鈥澨said Sarah Stredyer, Executive Director of Secure Families Initiative. 鈥淲e are energized to be fighting alongside this diverse group of partner organizations, to ensure every American - especially those who have been historically excluded from the ballot box - will have their voices heard.鈥
鈥淥ur elections are secure because we have tried and tested systems for counting ballots and certifying elections,鈥澨said Campaign Legal Center鈥檚 Voting Advocacy and Partnerships Director Jonathan Diaz. 鈥淗and-counting ballots at every precinct on election night would be neither fast nor accurate, and could cause unnecessary delays in the tabulation and canvassing of results and place additional strain on election administrators during the critical post-election period. The eleventh-hour rules adopted by the State Election Board only serve to cause disruption to the electoral process and confusion for voters. We are glad one state court has agreed that the hand-count rule cannot go into effect for the upcoming election and we encourage other courts to follow suit.鈥
###